Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to waiver of grounds and lack of interest in omitted recidivism reasoning.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant had previously waived all grounds for challenge and agreed to the sentence. The defense argued that the appellate court failed to justify the removal of the infraquinquennial recidivism form, but the court noted no interest in reasoning on a circumstance already eliminated by the first instance. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine to the Cassation Fund.