Italian court dismisses asylum claim where applicant fails to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 ECHR.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the interlocutory order regarding the asylum applicant's claim of persecution. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would violate Article 3 of the ECHR due to political persecution, but failed to provide concrete evidence of specific threats. The court ruled that without substantiated proof of individualized risk, the claim cannot proceed to a full merits review.