Italian Supreme Court dismisses asylum claim where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 CEDU.

The Corte di Cassazione dismissed the interlocutory order regarding the asylum applicant's claim of persecution. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to specific threats, but failed to provide concrete evidence of individualized risk. The court ruled that without substantiated proof of a well-founded fear of persecution, the claim cannot proceed to a full merits review.