Italian Supreme Court dismisses asylum claim where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 CEDU.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Corte di Cassazione dismissed the interlocutory order regarding the asylum applicant's claim of persecution. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to severe risks. The court rejected this assertion because the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of a well-founded fear of persecution or non-refoulement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 3 CEDU; Art. 103 l. 190/2012: The court establishes that an asylum claim based on Article 3 of the ECHR is inadmissible when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution or risk of non-refoulement with concrete evidence.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
!CORTE SUPREMA DI CASSAZIONE ITALGIUREWEB La sentenza richiesta è in fase di oscuramento*