Italian court dismisses asylum claim where applicant fails to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 ECHR.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the asylum application filed by an applicant who could not substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would expose them to severe human rights violations, but the court found no credible evidence supporting these claims. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirements for granting asylum were not met due to the lack of proof regarding non-refoulement risks.