Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of asylum claim due to lack of procedural standing.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's ruling on the inadmissibility of their asylum request. The applicant argued that the initial rejection violated their right to effective judicial protection, while the opposing party maintained strict adherence to procedural timelines. The court ruled that the applicant failed to demonstrate a valid legal interest or standing to challenge the specific procedural bar, thereby upholding the dismissal.