Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was relevant and necessary for a fair trial, while the lower court held that procedural requirements for its admission were not met. The court ruled that the evidence was inadmissible because the proper channels for its introduction had not been exhausted prior to the trial.