Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Cassation Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was relevant and necessary for a fair trial, while the opposing party maintained strict adherence to procedural rules regarding evidence admissibility. The court ruled that the evidence failed to meet the statutory requirements for admission at the preliminary stage, thereby upholding the lower court's procedural stance.