Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was crucial for proving the case facts, while the opposing party contended strict procedural rules required prior exhaustion of remedies. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the law by rejecting the appeal for non-exhaustion of procedural avenues.