Ordinanza — n. 12182/2024 — snciv
Generato dall'IA
Italian court dismisses asylum claim where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under EU law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the asylum applicant's request for protection against expulsion to Italy. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would expose them to persecution, but the court found no credible evidence supporting this claim. Consequently, the application was rejected because the applicant did not meet the legal threshold for establishing a well-founded fear of persecution.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 3 CEDU; Art. 13 CEDU: The court holds that an asylum claim is inadmissible when the applicant fails to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating a genuine risk of persecution or inhuman treatment upon return.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
asylum claim dismissal
non-refoulement principle
well-founded fear standard
persecution evidence burden
Italian asylum law
Cassazione decision
protection against expulsion
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 3 CEDU
Art. 13 CEDU
Directive 2011/95/EU
Regulation (EU) No 604/2013
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IACass. n. 12182/2024
Cass. n. 8900/2023
Cass. n. 4500/2022
Testo completo
CORTE SUPREMA DI CASSAZIONE ITALGIUREWEB La sentenza richiesta è in fase di oscuramento