Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to failure to specify procedural acts under Art. 366 n. 6 c.p.c.

The Court of Cassation declared the criminal appeal inadmissible because the petitioners failed to specifically identify the procedural acts relied upon in their arguments. The lower court had declared a property trust ineffective under Article 192 of the Penal Code, but the appeal cited various documents without pinpointing their exact location or content. Consequently, the court ruled that the petitioners did not meet the strict requirements of Article 366, paragraph 6, of the Code of Civil Procedure for admissibility.