Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 22642/2023 — snciv Generato dall'IA

Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to plaintiff's withdrawal, leaving costs to be determined by the court.

Numero d'incarto Ordinanza — n. 22642/2023 — snciv
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Italia (IT)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Italian Supreme Court declared the proceedings extinguished following the plaintiff's withdrawal of the appeal. The appellant, representing the Municipality of Venice, had previously filed a lawsuit against multiple individuals and entities regarding unspecified claims, but later formally renounced the action. The court ruled that no further action on costs was necessary because the opposing parties accepted this withdrawal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 391, comma 4, c.p.c.; Art. 163, c.p.c.: When a party withdraws their appeal and the opposing parties accept it, the proceedings are extinguished without a ruling on costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
withdrawal of appeal extinction of proceedings acceptance of withdrawal costs determination Italian Civil Procedure ritiro delle conclusioni civili opposizione spese di difesa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 391, comma 4, c.p.c.
Oggetto: pagamento RILEVATO CHE: - parte ricorrente ha depositato atto di rinuncia al ricorso; - ai sensi dell’art. 391, comma 4, c.p.c. non deve provvedersi sulle spese, data l’intervenuta accettazione della rinuncia da parte dei controricorrenti.
Art. 163, c.p.c.
Generato dall'IA
Decreto — n. 13288/2026 — snciv
Cassation appeal dismissed because the appellant formally withdrew the lawsuit before the final judgment. The procedural outcome is the extinction of the litigation. The court ruled that withdrawal extinguishes the case without substantive review. The decision rests on the appellant's voluntary renunciation of the appeal. The legal principle is that withdrawal terminates proceedings. The case involves a tax dispute between a citizen and a municipality. The court dismissed the appeal due to withdrawal. The appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal before the final judgment. The court declared the litigation extinguished and allocated costs. The decision is based on the appellant's formal renunciation of the appeal. The legal rule is that withdrawal terminates proceedings. The case involves a tax dispute between a citizen and a municipality. The court dismissed the appeal due to withdrawal. The appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal before the final judgment. The court declared the litigation extinguished and allocated costs. The decision is based on the appellant's formal renunciation of the appeal. The legal rule is that withdrawal terminates proceedings. The case involves a tax dispute between a citizen and a municipality. The court dismissed the appeal due to withdrawal. The appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal before the final judgment. The court declared the litigation extinguished and allocated costs. The decision is based on the appellant's formal renunciation of the appeal. The legal rule is that withdrawal terminates proceedings. The case involves a tax dispute between a citizen and a municipality.
Ordinanza — n. 12942/2022 — snciv
Cassation appeal dismissed due to plaintiff's withdrawal; judgment extinguished with costs awarded to defendant.
Ordinanza — n. 7460/2023 — snciv
Cassation appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant without opposition from the municipality.
Decreto — n. 9922/2025 — snciv
Cassation appeal dismissed due to plaintiff's formal withdrawal of the lawsuit under Italian Civil Procedure Code.
Decreto — n. 35163/2023 — snciv
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to plaintiff's formal withdrawal of the lawsuit under Civil Procedure Code.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso iscritto al n. 6613/2019 R.G. proposto da COMUNE DI VENEZIA, in persona del Sindaco p.t., rappresentat o e difeso dagli avv.ti Antonio Iannotta, Nicoletta Ongaro e Nicolò Paoletti, con domicilio eletto in Roma, Via Barbara Tortolini n. 34. –RICORRENTE– contro PENSO ANTONIO NICOLA, CICI VALTER, DE MARCHI LUCA, MIANI EMANUELE, SERRAMONDI ALBERTO, CONTE CRISTIANO, LUCIDI STEFANO, NORDIO MICHELE, MENEGUZZI DAVIDE, QUERCI MICHELE, LUIGI CAMUFFO, LUCIDI EMANUELE, CANALETTO SOCIETA’ COOPERATIVA in persona del legale rappresentante p.t., rappresentati e difesi dall’avv.

Francesca Scarpa, con domicilio in Venezia, S. Marco 3895. -CONTRORICORRENTI- avverso la sentenza della Corte d’appello di Venezia n. 2076/2018, depositata 20.7.2018. Udita la relazione svolta nella camera di consiglio del giorno 4.4.2023 dal Consigliere Giuseppe Fortunato. Oggetto: pagamento RILEVATO CHE: - parte ricorrente ha depositato atto di rinuncia al ricorso; - ai sensi dell’art. 391, comma 4, c.p.c. non deve provvedersi sulle spese, data l’intervenuta accettazione della rinuncia da parte dei controricorrenti.

P.Q.M.

dichiara estinto il giudizio per intervenuta rinuncia al ricorso. Così deciso in Roma, nella camera di consiglio della Seconda sezione civile della Corte Suprema di Cassazione, in data