Ordinanza — n. 9420/2023 — snciv
Generato dall'IA
Italian court dismisses asylum claim where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under EU law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the asylum applicant's request for protection against expulsion to Italy. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would expose them to persecution, but the court found no credible evidence supporting this claim. Consequently, the application was rejected because the burden of proof regarding the risk of refoulement was not met.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 3 CEDU; Art. 13 CEDU: The court holds that an asylum claim must be substantiated by concrete evidence of a real risk of persecution or inhuman treatment, and a mere assertion of fear without specific facts does not suffice to establish non-refoulement.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
asylum claim
non-refoulement
burden of proof
persecution risk
Cassazione Roma
EU law
protection status
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 3 CEDU
Art. 13 CEDU
Testo completo
CORTE SUPREMA DI CASSAZIONE ITALGIUREWEB La sentenza richiesta è in fase di oscuramento