Cassation court dismisses admissibility of constitutional question regarding administrative delay remedy and remands case.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the admissibility of a constitutional question raised by the applicant against an appellate order rejecting a claim for equitable compensation due to excessive administrative delay. The applicant argued that the law requiring a preliminary pre-removal request before claiming delay compensation violated constitutional rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. The court determined that the specific conditions for declaring a constitutional question admissible were not met, as the applicant failed to demonstrate the requisite relevance and non-manifestly unfounded nature of the issue.