Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding litigation cost compensation despite conflicting Supreme Court precedents.

The Court of Cassation rejected Leonardo Braccini's appeal against a lower court ruling that ordered equal sharing of litigation costs. Braccini argued that the trial court erred by compensating costs despite the Supreme Court's consistent stance on the legal issue, claiming no valid reason existed for such an outcome. The court held that the trial judge's assessment of conflicting precedents and the need for cost sharing was a factual matter within the trial court's exclusive authority, not subject to cassation review.