Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding refusal to renew technical expert office consultation due to lack of specific motivation.

The Court of Cassation rejected the appellant's appeal against a lower court's refusal to renew an office technical expert consultation. The appellant argued the lower court lacked sufficient reasoning for rejecting the request, while the lower court found the initial expert report exhaustive and the requested clarifications superfluous. The supreme court held that the lower court's decision was not arbitrary and did not require explicit refutation of opposing experts' arguments when the evidence already convinced the judge of the inquiry's irrelevance.