Cassation court dismisses tax appeal as inadmissible due to lack of specificity regarding administrative acts cited.

The Court of Cassation declared the tax agency's appeal inadmissible because the grounds lacked the required specificity under Article 366 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The agency argued the lower court failed to note the taxpayer's lack of interest, claiming she should have challenged a subsequent notice instead of the current one. The court rejected this, ruling that the taxpayer failed to quote the specific text of the administrative act allegedly misinterpreted or omitted by the trial judge.