Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of new legal grounds despite contested jurisdictional interpretations.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the lower court's decision to shift litigation costs was based on a recognized but isolated judicial contradiction. The appellant argued that no such contradiction existed, while the Ministry of Justice contended the lower court correctly applied the exception for exceptional legal uncertainty. The court ruled that the lower court's finding of an exceptional reason to deviate from standard cost allocation rules was not legally flawed and thus the appeal lacked the necessary novelty or change in jurisprudence required for admissibility.