Court corrects a clerical error in a previous ruling regarding the proper appellate court for case remand.

The Court of Cassation corrected a material error in its own prior judgment where the remand destination was incorrectly stated as Turin instead of Naples. The appellant challenged this correction, but the Court affirmed that the body of the decision clearly indicated Naples as the intended appellate court. Consequently, the Court ruled that the text in the operative part must be interpreted to align with the substantive reasoning, mandating the annotation of the correct court.