Court partially allows revocatory action against sale, ruling mere price disparity insufficient without patrimonial insufficiency aggravation.

The Court of Cassation partially allowed Antonio Lemmo's appeal against the lower court's dismissal of his revocatory action. Lemmo argued the sale was simulated due to an irrisory price and the debtor's insufficient assets, while the lower court focused only on price disparity. The court held that mere price difference is insufficient; the creditor must prove the sale aggravated an existing patrimonial insufficiency.