Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IEHC 133 ECLI:IE:HC:2019:133 AI generated

High Court dismisses applicant's claim that Minister failed to assess special reception needs within 30 days.

Case Number IEHC 133
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Ireland (IE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court dismissed the applicant's application for certiorari against the Minister for Justice. The applicant, a minor with a mother, argued the Minister failed to assess her as a recipient with special reception needs within the statutory 30-day window. The court held that Regulation 8 permits the Minister to continue assessments beyond the initial period if necessary, and the Minister had not breached the time limit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Regulation 8(1) of the Reception Conditions Regulations 2018; The Minister may continue assessing whether an applicant has special reception needs beyond the initial 30-day period if it remains necessary to do so.

Keywords

AI generated
special reception needs international protection material reception conditions Regulation 8 certiorari time limit Minister for Justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Regulation 8(1) of the Reception Conditions Regulations 2018
Article 18 of the Qualification Directive

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Francovich and Others
Brasserie du Pêcheur v. Federal Republic of Germany
Brasserie du Pêcheur v. Federal Republic of Germany and R v.
R v. Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame
Federal Republic of Germany and R v. Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame
Ogieriakhi v. MJE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

THE HIGH COURT

2018 No. 882 JR

X AND Y (A MINOR SUING BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND X)

Applicant

– and –

THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY

Respondent

JUDGMENT of Mr Justice Max Barrett delivered on 5th March, 2019.

submitted an application for international protection requested accommodation for my daughter and

officer with whom I was speaking pointed at my daughter…and stated that we had obviously slept somewhere the night before and…should return

there.

Material reception conditions are only provided to applicants that do not have sufficient means to have an adequate

standard of living. You are now requested to complete the attached declaration and return it to the Reception and Integration Agency…without delay”.

vulnerability assessment”

inter alia a single mother…relies…on…her

cousin to take care of her daughter has a history of depression…in and…Ireland….She is not currently taking…

medication but…relies...on a support network in Dublin. She is frightened that her depression will return if that…network is removed (particularly her

cousin)…impact on her ability to care for her daughter

advice in relation to the issue of this woman having to remain in Dublin”. “I see no medical indications

for her to be accommodated in Dublin”.

assessed

assessed in accordance with

Regulation 8

Regulation 8(1) requires the Minister to assess whether a recipient is a

recipient with special reception needs; and permits the Minister to continue to do so after the expiry of the 30 working day period as necessary….The

Minister’s case is that the question of whether the applicant was a recipient with special reception needs was assessed within 30 working days; and that the

Minister continues to assess this question thereafter (and was continuing to do so when the proceedings were initiated).”

where he or she

considers it necessary to do so

“has

been considered in line with the…Regulations”

vulnerable person

not have sufficient means to have an adequate standard

of living”

not have sufficient means to have an

adequate standard of living”

not have sufficient means to have an adequate standard of living”

Member States shall ensure that material reception conditions are available to applicants when they make their application for international

protection”.

Francovich and Others

Brasserie du Pêcheur v. Federal Republic of Germany and R v. Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame

Ogieriakhi v. MJE

Francovich

after

Conclusion

certiorari

recipient with special reception needs

Ogierakhi