Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IECA 36 ECLI:IE:CA:2019:36 AI generated

Court extends time to appeal sentence severity due to applicant's lack of knowledge regarding backdating error.

Case Number IECA 36
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Ireland (IE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal granted an extension of time for the applicant to appeal the severity of his sentence. The applicant had intended to appeal but was unaware that his sentence had been backdated to December 2016 instead of his actual custody date in November 2015. The court determined that justice required granting the extension because the delay resulted from this specific lack of knowledge and the grounds of appeal were already forwarded to the court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Criminal Procedure Act 2007; Criminal Procedure Rules 2014: The court may extend time for appealing sentence severity where the applicant was unaware of a backdating error affecting the appeal period.

Keywords

AI generated
extension of time sentence severity appeal backdating error lack of knowledge interest of justice criminal procedure time limit

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

THE COURT OF APPEAL

[112/2018]

Edwards J.

Baker J.

Kennedy J.

BETWEEN/

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

RESPONDENT

- AND –

TIBOR HRICKO

APPLICANT

JUDGMENT of the Court (ex tempore) delivered on the 5th day of February 2019 by Ms. Justice Kennedy

1. This is an application to extend the time within which to appeal against the severity of sentence. The notice of application is dated

the 19th October 2018 and filed on the 25th October 2018. It is important to know the background to the application and it concerns

that fact that on the 28th June 2017, the applicant was sentenced to a period of imprisonment of eight years, the final twelve

months of which were suspended, in respect of counts of defilement and five years imprisonment in respect of counts of sexual

assault. The sentences were backdated to the 20th December 2016. There is somewhat of a history to the matter in that it appears

that the applicant pleaded guilty on the 2nd June 2016 but he was permitted to change his plea to one of not guilty and ultimately,

he was convicted by a jury on the 25th May 2017. It also transpires on foot of the affidavit filed that he has been in custody since

the 20th November 2015.

2. An affidavit has been sworn by his solicitor, Mr Byrne, which is dated the 30th October 2018 and it refers to the matters that I

have just outlined. It appears at para 5 of the affidavit, that on the 25th May 2017 there was no discussion regarding the applicant’s

sentence. On the 29th June 2017, the applicant was advised as to the merits of appealing conviction and sentence and he indicated

at that point he did not wish to appeal either conviction or sentence. However, it seems he was unaware that his sentence had not

been backdated to the date when he was lodged in custody, being the 20th November 2015.

3. On the 17th July 2017, when his solicitor consulted with the applicant whist he was incarcerated, he became aware that the

sentence had not been backdated to the date he had been lodged in custody and had been backdated to the 20th December 2016.

He then instructed his solicitor that he had already attended with the Governor of the prison for the purpose of lodging his appeal.

4. On the 25th July 2017, the grounds of appeal were forwarded by his solicitor to the office of the Court of Appeal and it transpired

that the notice of appeal had not in fact been lodged. So, they are the very particular circumstances which apply. So, in summary,

the applicant seeks to appeal the severity of his sentence and he specifically seeks to have his sentence backdated to the date

when he was initially lodged in custody. There are other grounds of appeal also set forward; namely, he contends that the judge

erred in finding that he had breached conditions of his bail in circumstances where he says that he was first charged on the 20th

November 2015.

5. In the particular circumstances, the position being that the applicant and his solicitor only became aware on the 20th March 2018

that the notice of appeal had not in fact been lodged and in circumstances where, on the 25th July 2017, a copy of the grounds of

appeal had been forwarded to the Court of Appeal office and it appearing that there had been some error in that the notice of appeal

had not been filed within time, notwithstanding that the applicant had formed the intention to appeal within the prescribed time

period, we are satisfied that the interest of justice would be served by granting an extension of time and we will, in those

circumstances, grant an extension of time taking into consideration the background facts and the merits of the application.