Rejection of Interim Relief in Administrative Dispute Due to Insufficient Urgency

A plaintiff filed a request for the suspension of a contested administrative decision, arguing that the decision lacked a necessary prior consultation and that its implementation would cause irreparable harm, while the defendant authority maintained the decision was lawful and necessary for the public interest. The court rejected the request for interim relief, finding that the urgency criterion required for suspension was not met because the alleged irreparable harm was not sufficiently established and immediate, and furthermore, the arguments questioning the legality of the decision did not present a serious doubt strong enough to warrant suspending the administrative act pending a full review of the merits.