Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
20/035021 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Withdrawal and Extinction of Instance

Numéro de cause 20/035021
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant filed a declaration of appeal on July 31, 2020, challenging a substantive decision rendered by the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Nantes on December 19, 2019, against which the Public Prosecutor had not filed any cross-appeal or incidental requests. The Court, based on articles 400 to 405, 769, and 907 of the Code of Civil Procedure, noted that the appellant withdrew their appeal on November 5, 2020, leading the Court to declare the instance extinct and order the appellant to pay the costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

article 400 à 405 du code de procédure civile, article 769 du code de procédure civile, article 907 du code de procédure civile, article 400 à 405, 769 et 907 du code de procédure civile, article 405 du code de procédure civile, article 696 du code de procédure civile; Appeal Withdrawal and Extinction of Instance: The Court, based on articles 400 to 405, 769, and 907 of the Code of Civil Procedure, noted that the appellant withdrew their appeal on November 5, 2020, leading the Court to declare the instance extinct and order the appellant to pay the costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
article du CPC décisions incidentes retrait de la requête qualité pour recourir droit d'enlèvement délais de recours

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
article 400 à 405 du code de procédure civile
These articles of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning withdrawal were cited as the basis for the court's action regarding the case being declared extinct due to the appellant's withdrawal.
article 769 du code de procédure civile
This procedural article was cited in relation to the circumstances leading to the decision.
article 907 du code de procédure civile
This procedural article was cited in relation to the circumstances leading to the decision.
article 400 à 405, 769 et 907 du code de procédure civile
The court explicitly acted upon the extinction of the instance based on the cited provisions.
article 405 du code de procédure civile
The declaration that the filing act is rendered void (caduc) is implicitly covered by the rules governing withdrawal (Art. 400-405 CPC), which resulted in the extinction of the instance.
article 696 du code de procédure civile
Although not explicitly listed in the section referencing the legal basis for the extinction, the order to condemn the appellant to the costs implies the application of the general rules on costs, typically Article 696 CPC, although this specific article citation is often omitted when only the result is stated following a withdrawal.
Généré par l'IA
15/012487
Appeal Withdrawal and Extinction of Proceedings
11/01728
Withdrawal of Appeal and Extinction of Instance
13/01357
Withdrawal of Appeal and Extinction of Proceedings
18/069451
Withdrawal of Appeal and Extinction of Case
22-18274
Withdrawal of Appeal in Property Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
article 400 à 405 du code de procédure civile

These articles of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning withdrawal were cited as the basis for the court's action regarding the case being declared extinct due to the appellant's withdrawal.

article 769 du code de procédure civile

This procedural article was cited in relation to the circumstances leading to the decision.

article 907 du code de procédure civile

This procedural article was cited in relation to the circumstances leading to the decision.

article 400 à 405, 769 et 907 du code de procédure civile

The court explicitly acted upon the extinction of the instance based on the cited provisions.

article 405 du code de procédure civile

The declaration that the filing act is rendered void (caduc) is implicitly covered by the rules governing withdrawal (Art. 400-405 CPC), which resulted in the extinction of the instance.

article 696 du code de procédure civile

Although not explicitly listed in the section referencing the legal basis for the extinction, the order to condemn the appellant to the costs implies the application of the general rules on costs, typically Article 696 CPC, although this specific article citation is often omitted when only the result is stated following a withdrawal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES

CHAMBRE : 6ème Chambre A

R.G. : No RG 20/03502 - No Portalis DBVL-V-B7E-QZYW Nature de l'acte de saisine : Déclaration d'appel valant inscription au rôle Date de l'acte de saisine : 31 Juillet 2020 Date de la saisine : 03 Août 2020 Date de la décision attaquée : 19 DECEMBRE 2019 Décision attaquée : AU FOND Juridiction : TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE NANTES ___________________________________________________________________________

APPELANTE [J] [J] Représentée par Me Emmanuelle LEUDET, avocat au barreau de NANTES

INTIMES PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE PRES LE TGI DE NANTES PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL PRÈS LA COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES

__________________________________________________________________________ ORDONNANCE CONSTATANT L'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE Désistement

OCME209

Le Magistrat de la mise en état,

Vu les articles 400 à 405, 769 et 907 du code de procédure civile,

Considérant que l'appelante s'est désistée de son recours le 05 Novembre 2020,

Que le Ministère Public n'a formé au préalable ni appel incident ni demande incidente,

CONSTATE l'extinction de l'instance ;

CONDAMNE l'appelante aux dépens.

RENNES, le 18 Novembre 2020