Withdrawal of Primary Appeal Renders Incidental Appeals Null
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn individual convicted of attempted aggravated murder and aggravated voluntary assault by a court of assizes appealed the sentence, followed by a cross-appeal lodged by the public prosecutor and the civil parties. The Court of Cassation noted that the convicted person subsequently withdrew their appeal, which action rendered the incidental appeals by the prosecutor and civil parties null and void, and therefore ruled that there was no need to designate an appellate court to hear the case.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAarticle 567-1-1 du code de procédure pénale, article 380-15 du code de procédure pénale, article 380-1 du code de procédure pénale, article 380-2 du code de procédure pénale, article 380-3 du code de procédure pénale, article 380-4 du code de procédure pénale; Withdrawal of Primary Appeal Renders Incidental Appeals Null: The Court of Cassation noted that the convicted person subsequently withdrew their appeal, which action rendered the incidental appeals by the prosecutor and civil parties null and void, and therefore ruled that there was no need to designate an appellate court to hear the case.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article is cited in the preamble, which sets the stage for the procedural framework governing the appeal, although the final orders rely on the consequences of the withdrawal.
This article establishes the composition of the panel that deliberated and ruled on the case.
Texte complet
LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique, tenue au Palais de Justice, à PARIS, le vingt-six février deux mille quatorze, a rendu l'arrêt suivant :
Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller référendaire BEGHIN et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général LE BAUT ;
Vu l'appel interjeté par :
- M. Jean-Pierre X...,
de l'arrêt de la cour d'assises du PAS-DE-CALAIS, en date du 13 décembre 2013, qui, pour tentative de meurtre aggravé et violences volontaires aggravées, l'a condamné à huit ans d'emprisonnement et quatre ans de suivi socio-judiciaire, ainsi que de l'arrêt du même jour par lequel la cour a prononcé sur les intérêts civils ;
Vu l'appel incident du ministère public ;
Vu l'appel incident des parties civiles ;
Vu les articles 380-1 à 380-15 du code de procédure pénale ;
Vu les observations écrites du ministère public et des parties ;
Attendu que par déclaration au greffe de l'établissement pénitentiaire, en date du 17 janvier 2014, M. X... s'est désisté de son appel ; qu'il convient de lui en donner acte ;
Que ce désistement rend caducs les appels incidents formés par le ministère public et les parties civiles ;
Par ces motifs :
DONNE ACTE à M. Jean-Pierre X... de son désistement d'appel ;
CONSTATE la caducité des appels du ministère public et des parties civiles ;
DIT n'y avoir lieu à désignation d'une cour d'assises chargée de statuer en appel ;
Ainsi jugé et prononcé par la Cour de cassation, chambre criminelle, en son audience publique, les jour, mois et an que dessus ;
Etaient présents aux débats et au délibéré, dans la formation prévue à l'article 567-1-1 du code de procédure pénale : M. Louvel, président, M. Beghin, conseiller rapporteur, M. Foulquié, conseiller de la chambre ;
Greffier de chambre : Mme Téplier ;
En foi de quoi le présent arrêt a été signé par le président, le rapporteur et le greffier de chambre ;