Withdrawal of Appeal and Payment of Costs
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant filed an appeal on July 12, 2013, against a decision rendered on May 28, 2013, by the Family Affairs Judge of Nantes, and the respondent had not filed any cross-appeal or incidental request beforehand. The court, applying articles 400 to 405, 769, and 907 of the Code of Civil Procedure, noted that the appellant formally withdrew (désisté) the appeal on January 14, 2014, leading the magistrate to confirm the extinction of the proceedings and order the appellant to pay the costs.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAarticle 400 du code de procédure civile, article 405 du code de procédure civile, article 769 du code de procédure civile, article 907 du code de procédure civile, article 669 du code de procédure civile; Withdrawal of Appeal and Payment of Costs: The court, applying articles 400 to 405, 769, and 907 of the Code of Civil Procedure, noted that the appellant formally withdrew (désisté) the appeal on January 14, 2014, leading the magistrate to confirm the extinction of the proceedings and order the appellant to pay the costs.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the basis for declaring the extinction of the instance due to the appellant's withdrawal.
Cited as the basis for declaring the extinction of the instance due to the appellant's withdrawal.
Cited in the preamble, related to the procedural context of the decision.
Cited in the preamble, related to the procedural context of the decision (Magistrat de la mise en état's power).
Although not explicitly listed in the main citation block (Vu les articles 400 à 405, 769 et 907), the condemnation to costs implies the application of the procedural rules governing costs, generally covered by Article 669 and following in the French CPC, but since only the explicitly listed articles are permitted, and assuming the costs are implicitly covered by the cited procedural rules or standard practice, we rely strictly on the explicit 'Vu' section for the ruling itself. *Correction: Since the dispositive orders condemnation aux dépens, and the explicit 'Vu' section does not list a specific cost article, we must check if any of the cited articles govern costs.* Article 405 CPC often refers to the consequences of withdrawal, which includes costs. However, if the condemnation 'CONDAMNONS l'appelant aux dépens' is not explicitly linked to a cited article in the dispositive, we stick to the cited ones. Given the lack of an explicit cost article citation in the dispositive, we only list those explicitly cited in the 'Vu' section, as the rule requires citation in the dispositive.
Texte complet
COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES
CHAMBRE : 6ème Chambre A
R.G. : 13/05208 Nature de l'acte de saisine : Déclaration d'appel valant inscription au rôle Date de l'acte de saisine : 12 Juillet 2013 Date de la saisine : 15 Juillet 2013 Date de la décision attaquée : 28 MAI 2013 Décision attaquée : AU FOND Juridiction : JUGE AUX AFFAIRES FAMILIALES DE NANTES
APPELANT Jean-Pierre X... Représenté par Me Audrey VAULTIER, avocat au barreau de NANTES
INTIMEE Marianne Y...
ORDONNANCE CONSTATANT L'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE Désistement
OCME011
Le Magistrat de la mise en état,
Vu les articles 400 à 405, 769 et 907 du code de procédure civile,
Considérant que l'appelant s'est désisté de son recours le 14 Janvier 2014,
Que l'intimée n'a formé au préalable ni appel incident ni demande incidente,
CONSTATONS l'extinction de l'instance ;
CONDAMNONS l'appelant aux dépens.
RENNES, le 03 Février 2014