Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
10/02958 Généré par l'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal from Labor Tribunal Order

Numéro de cause 10/02958
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, having appealed an interlocutory order from the Labor Tribunal dated November 16, 2010, subsequently submitted a letter to the court of appeal on July 25, 2011, formally withdrawing the appeal proceedings, in the absence of any cross-appeal by the respondent. Consequently, the instructing judge noted the withdrawal, declared the instance extinguished, the court divested of jurisdiction, and ordered the appellant to pay the costs, subject to any agreement between the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 397, Art. 396, Art. 399, Art. 400, Art. 401, Art. 403; Withdrawal of Appeal from Labor Tribunal Order: Consequently, the instructing judge noted the withdrawal, declared the instance extinguished, the court divested of jurisdiction, and ordered the appellant to pay the costs, subject to any agreement between the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
décision préjudicielle attaquable retrait de la requête litiges du travail commandement de payer droit à la déconnexion suspension des travaux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 397
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 396
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 399
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 400
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 401
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 403
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 405
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Art. 945
This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 397

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 396

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 399

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 400

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 401

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 403

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 405

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Art. 945

This article is cited among the provisions governing the instruction of the case, in conjunction with the order recording the withdrawal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

COUR D'APPEL

D'ANGERS

Chambre Sociale

RG N : 10/02958

Affaire : Ordonnance Référé, origine Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de LAVAL, décision attaquée en date du 16 Novembre 2010, enregistrée sous le no 10/00076

ORDONNANCE N 462/11

Madame Isabelle X... épouse Y...

...

77150 LESIGNY

Représentant : Me Philippe MOUGEOTTE (avocat au barreau de PARIS)

APPELANT

SAS SOFAME

Route de Bonnétable

72190 SARGE LES LE MANS

Représentant : Me Eric BERTHOME (avocat au barreau de BLOIS)

INTIME

ORDONNANCE DU MAGISTRAT CHARGE D'INSTRUIRE L'AFFAIRE

Nous, Brigitte ARNAUD-PETIT, magistrat chargé d'instruire l'affaire,

Vu les dispositions des articles 396, 397, 399, 400, 401, 403, 405 et 945 du code de procédure civile,

Vu l'appel en date du 30 novembre 2010, interjeté par Madame Isabelle X... épouse Y... à l'encontre de l'ordonnance de référé rendue par le conseil de prud'hommes de LAVAL, en date du 16 novembre 2010,

Vu le courrier reçu au greffe de la cour d'appel, le 25 juillet 2011, par lequel Madame Isabelle X... épouse Y... indique se désister de l'instance d'appel, contre ladite ordonnance de référé,

Vu l'absence d'appel incident de la SAS SOFAME,

PAR CES MOTIFS,

Donnons acte à Madame Isabelle X... épouse Y... de son désistement.

Constatons l'extinction de l'instance et le dessaisissement de la cour et condamnons Madame Isabelle X... épouse Y... aux dépens, sous réserve d'un éventuel accord des parties.

Fait à ANGERS le 30 Août 2011

Le magistrat chargé d'instruire l'affaire,