Appeal Dismissed for Theft, Forgery, Contempt, and Impersonation Convictions
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was dismissed concerning a conviction for theft, check forgery and use, contempt of a public officer, and the use of a document resembling a national police identification document, which resulted in a one-year imprisonment sentence and the revocation of a three-year suspended sentence previously granted for an earlier conviction; the court rejected the appeal because the personal brief submitted offered mere allegations without citing any specific law allegedly violated, and found the appellate judgment to be procedurally sound.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAAppeal Dismissed for Theft, Forgery, Contempt, and Impersonation Convictions: The appeal was dismissed concerning a conviction for theft, check forgery and use, contempt of a public officer, and the use of a document resembling a national police identification document, which resulted in a one-year imprisonment sentence and the revocation of a three-year suspended sentence previously granted for an earlier conviction; the court rejected the appeal because the personal brief submitted offered mere allegations without citing any specific law allegedly violated, and found the appellate judgment to be procedurally sound.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI DE : - X... THIERRY CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE COLMAR, CHAMBRE CORRECTIONNELLE, EN DATE DU 5 OCTOBRE 1982 QUI, POUR VOLS, FALSIFICATION DE CHEQUES ET USAGE DE CHEQUES FALSIFIES, OUTRAGES A AGENT DE LA FORCE PUBLIQUE ET USAGE D'UN DOCUMENT PRESENTANT UNE RESSEMBLANCE AVEC LES DOCUMENTS DISTINCTIFS RESERVES AUX FONCTIONNAIRES DE LA POLICE NATIONALE, L'A CONDAMNE A UN AN D'EMPRISONNEMENT ET A REVOQUE LE SURSIS AVEC MISE A L'EPREUVE PENDANT 3 ANS ACCORDES AU PREVENU POUR L'EXECUTION DE LA PEINE D'UN AN PRONONCEE LE 11 DECEMBRE 1979 PAR LE TRIBUNAL CORRECTIONNEL DE MARSEILLE ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT ;
ATTENDU QUE LE MEMOIRE QUI PROCEDE PAR SIMPLES ALLEGATIONS NE VISE AUCUN TEXTE DE LOI DONT LA VIOLATION SERAIT INVOQUEE ;
ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI ;