Labor Code Violation Appeal Dismissed for Defective Signature
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a correctional court decision from Douai that convicted an individual for labor code violations, imposing fines, and held a company civilly liable. The Court of Cassation rejected both appeals because the joint personal brief submitted by the appellants lacked the required signature of the appellants themselves, only bearing that of their counsel, thereby failing to meet the formal requirements of Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure necessary to properly bring the grounds of appeal before the Court, while confirming the appealed judgment was otherwise procedurally regular.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Labor Code Violation Appeal Dismissed for Defective Signature: The Court of Cassation rejected both appeals because the joint personal brief submitted by the appellants lacked the required signature of the appellants themselves, only bearing that of their counsel, thereby failing to meet the formal requirements of Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure necessary to properly bring the grounds of appeal before the Court, while confirming the appealed judgment was otherwise procedurally regular.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe common personal brief filed did not bear the required signatures, thus failing to properly seize the Court of Cassation according to the terms of this article.
Texte complet
STATUANT SUR LES POURVOIS FORMES PAR : - X... JEAN - - SOCIETE LESSOR - CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE DOUAI (CHAMBRE CORRECTIONNELLE, EN DATE DU 23 JUIN 1982 QUI A CONDAMNE X..., POUR INFRACTIONS AU CODE DU TRAVAIL, A 10 AMENDES DE 400 FRANCS, ET A DECLARE LA SOCIETE LESSOR CIVILEMENT RESPONSABLE ;
VU LA CONNEXITE JOIGNANT LES POURVOIS ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL COMMUN PRODUIT ;
ATTENDU QUE LEDIT MEMOIRE NE PORTE PAS LA SIGNATURE DES DEMANDEURS MAIS SEULEMENT CELLE DE LEUR CONSEIL ;
QUE DES LORS, N'ETANT PAS ETABLI DANS LA FORME PREVUE PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, IL NE SAISIT PAS LA COUR DE CASSATION DES MOYENS QUI PEUVENT Y ETRE CONTENUS ;
ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;
REJETTE LES POURVOIS ;