Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000007522936 Généré par l'IA

Civil Party Appeal Inadmissibility for Lack of Legal Argument in Theft Non-Suit

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000007522936
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The civil party appealed a decision by the Court of Appeal's indictment chamber which upheld a decision of non-suit in a theft proceeding. The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant's personal memorandum only discussed the facts upon which the judges based their decision, contained no legal arguments, and did not cite any violated laws, thereby failing to meet the procedural requirements for a civil party to appeal to the Court of Cassation when the public prosecutor has not appealed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 590 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 575 DU CODE PRECITE; Civil Party Appeal Inadmissibility for Lack of Legal Argument in Theft Non-Suit: The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant's personal memorandum only discussed the facts upon which the judges based their decision, contained no legal arguments, and did not cite any violated laws, thereby failing to meet the procedural requirements for a civil party to appeal to the Court of Cassation when the public prosecutor has not appealed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
condition de recevabilité ordonnance de renvoi recours contre décision de renvoi abus de droit violation des droits de partie entraide judiciaire civile

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 590 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The appeal was rejected because the submitted brief failed to meet the conditions imposed by this article by not stating any legal grounds.
ARTICLE 575 DU CODE PRECITE
The appeal was declared inadmissible because none of the grievances listed in this article, which would grant the civil party the right to appeal against the decision of the Chamber of Accusation in the absence of an appeal by the Public Prosecutor, were substantiated.
Généré par l'IA
93-80387
Civil Party Appeal Against Non-Suit Decision Inadmissible
91-80539
Civil Party Appeal of Non-Suit Ruling Deemed Inadmissible by Supreme Court
04-85209
Civil Party Appeal on Non-Suit for Fraud and Other Charges Dismissed for Inadmissibility
JURITEXT000007522450
Civil Party Appeal Against Non-Suit Dismissed for Inadmissibility
97-80054
Civil Party Appeal Against Non-Prosecution Order Inadmissible

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 590 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The appeal was rejected because the submitted brief failed to meet the conditions imposed by this article by not stating any legal grounds.

ARTICLE 575 DU CODE PRECITE

The appeal was declared inadmissible because none of the grievances listed in this article, which would grant the civil party the right to appeal against the decision of the Chamber of Accusation in the absence of an appeal by the Public Prosecutor, were substantiated.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - X... JEANNE, PARTIE CIVILE, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE D 'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS, EN DATE DU 23 FEVRIER 1982, QUI, DANS UNE PROCEDURE SUIVIE CONTRE X DU CHEF DE VOL, A CONFIRME L'ORDONNANCE DE NON-LIEU RENDUE PAR LE JUGE D'INSTRUCTION ;

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL SIGNE PAR LA DEMANDERESSE ;

ATTENDU QUE LE MEMOIRE, QUI SE BORNE A DISCUTER LES FAITS SUR LESQUELS LES JUGES ONT FONDE LEUR DECISION, NE CONTIENT AUCUN MOYEN DE DROIT ET NE VISE AUCUN DES TEXTES DE LOI DONT LA VIOLATION EST ALLEGUEE ;

QU'IL NE REMPLIT PAS LES CONDITIONS IMPOSEES PAR L'ARTICLE 590 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET NE PEUT, DES LORS, ETRE ACCUEILLI ;

ET ATTENDU QU'IL N'EST AINSI JUSTIFIE D'AUCUN DES GRIEFS QUI, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 575 DU CODE PRECITE, OUVRENT LE DROIT A LA PARTIE CIVILE DE SE POURVOIR EN CASSATION CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION, EN L'ABSENCE DE POURVOI DU MINISTERE PUBLIC ;

QUE, DES LORS, LE POURVOI DOIT ETRE DECLARE IRRECEVABLE ;

DECLARE LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE ;