State v. Minor Convict (Unsigned Appeal)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against a decision by the Assize Court of Minors that sentenced the appellant to nine years of criminal confinement for aggravated theft, thefts, and attempted extortion, because the appellant's submitted personal memorandum was unsigned, thus failing to meet the procedural requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure for properly presenting grounds for appeal, and the court found the overall procedure to be regular with the imposed penalty legally applied to the facts established by the court and jury.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArticle 584 du code de procédure pénale; State v. Minor Convict (Unsigned Appeal): The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against a decision by the Assize Court of Minors that sentenced the appellant to nine years of criminal confinement for aggravated theft, thefts, and attempted extortion, because the appellant's submitted personal memorandum was unsigned, thus failing to meet the procedural requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure for properly presenting grounds for appeal, and the court found the overall procedure to be regular with the imposed penalty legally applied to the facts established by the court and jury.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was rejected because the personal memorandum filed did not meet the requirements set out in this article.
Texte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - JACOB X..., CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'ASSISES DES MINEURS DE LA MEURTHE ET MOSELLE DU 18 MAI 1983 QUI L'A CONDAMNE A NEUF ANNEES DE RECLUSION CRIMINELLE POUR VOL QUALIFIE, VOLS ET TENTATIVE D'EXTORSION DE FONDS ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT ;
ATTENDU QUE CE MEMOIRE, QUI N'EST PAS SIGNE PAR LE DEMANDEUR, NE REMPLIT PAS LES CONDITIONS EXIGEES PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET NE SAISIT PAS LA COUR DE CASSATION DES MOYENS QU'IL POURRAIT CONTENIR ;
ET ATTENDU QUE LA PROCEDURE EST REGULIERE ET QUE LA PEINE A ETE LEGALEMENT APPLIQUEE AUX FAITS DECLARES CONSTANTS PAR LA COUR ET PAR LE JURY ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI ;