Rejection of Appeal Against Expulsion Order Violation Sentence
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant challenged a Paris Court of Appeal decision that sentenced them to seven months imprisonment for violating an expulsion order. Because no grounds were presented to support the appeal, the Court of Cassation found the challenged ruling formally regular and determined that the established facts sufficiently justified both the legal classification of the offense and the imposed penalty, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IARejection of Appeal Against Expulsion Order Violation Sentence: Because no grounds were presented to support the appeal, the Court of Cassation found the challenged ruling formally regular and determined that the established facts sufficiently justified both the legal classification of the offense and the imposed penalty, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - X... MOUSSA - CONTRE UN ARRET RENDU LE 5 MAI 1983 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS QUI L'A CONDAMNE A 7 MOIS D'EMPRISONNEMENT POUR INFRACTION A UN ARRETE D'EXPULSION ;
ATTENDU QU'AUCUN MOYEN N'EST PRODUIT A L'APPUI DU POURVOI, QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ET QUE LES FAITS SOUVERAINEMENT CONSTATES JUSTIFIENT LA QUALIFICATION ET LA PEINE ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI ;