Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000007520302 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Provisional Detention for Violence Against a Minor Admissible for Form Only

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000007520302
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal contested a decision by the indictment chamber that overturned a lower court's order for judicial supervision and instead mandated the provisional detention of the accused on charges of violence against a minor under fifteen. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal because the appellant's personal memorandum was improperly signed only by her counsel, failing to meet the formal requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code, and consequently, the Court could not examine its substance; furthermore, the Court confirmed that the indictment chamber's order for detention was properly reasoned and based on elements specific to the case, adhering to the legal provisions governing provisional detention.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 144 DUDIT CODE, ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE, ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Regarding Provisional Detention for Violence Against a Minor Admissible for Form Only: The Supreme Court rejected the appeal because the appellant's personal memorandum was improperly signed only by her counsel, failing to meet the formal requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code, and consequently, the Court could not examine its substance; furthermore, the Court confirmed that the indictment chamber's order for detention was properly reasoned and based on elements specific to the case, adhering to the legal provisions governing provisional detention.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
code de procédure pénale ordonnance de renvoi arrêts lésion corporelle sur mineur recours contre décision de renvoi conseil juridique mandaté

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The memory filed by the applicant was not signed by the interested party, thus not meeting the formal requirements of this article, leading to the inadmissibility of the arguments contained therein.
ARTICLE 144 DUDIT CODE
The Court confirmed that the detention order was based on the cases exhaustively enumerated in this article.
ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE
The Court confirmed that the decision to order the detention was specially reasoned according to the elements of the case, as required by this article.
ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The Court verified that the detention was ordered under the conditions provided for by this article.
Généré par l'IA
11-86905
Appeal of Provisional Detention for Murder and Related Charges
02-84376
Provisional Detention Upheld for Rape and Sexual Assault Against a Minor
96-80342
Appellant v. Republic on Provisional Detention for Rape of Minors
97-83281
Appeal Against Provisional Detention for Rape and Kidnapping Resulting in Death Upheld
10-87937
Appeal Against Extension of Provisional Detention for Aggravated Offenses

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The memory filed by the applicant was not signed by the interested party, thus not meeting the formal requirements of this article, leading to the inadmissibility of the arguments contained therein.

ARTICLE 144 DUDIT CODE

The Court confirmed that the detention order was based on the cases exhaustively enumerated in this article.

ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE

The Court confirmed that the decision to order the detention was specially reasoned according to the elements of the case, as required by this article.

ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The Court verified that the detention was ordered under the conditions provided for by this article.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - X... PATRICIA EPOUSE Y..., CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE MONTPELLIER EN DATE DU 5 MARS 1982 QUI, INFIRMANT LA DECISION DU JUGE D'INSTRUCTION LA PLACANT SOUS CONTROLE JUDICIAIRE DANS L'INFORMATION SUIVIE CONTRE ELLE DU CHEF DE VIOLENCES ET VOIES DE FAIT SUR MINEURE DE 15 ANS, A ORDONNE SON PLACEMENT EN DETENTION PROVISOIRE ;

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT PAR LA DEMANDERESSE ;

ATTENDU QUE LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL SUSVISE NE PORTE PAS LA SIGNATURE DE L'INTERESSEE MAIS SEULEMENT CELLE DE SON CONSEIL ;

QUE, DES LORS, N'ETANT PAS ETABLI DANS LA FORME PRESCRITE PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, CE MEMOIRE NE SAISIT PAS LA COUR DE CASSATION DES MOYENS QUI PEUVENT Y ETRE CONTENUS ;

ET ATTENDU QUE LA COUR DE CASSATION EST EN MESURE DE S'ASSURER QUE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION A ORDONNE LA MISE EN DETENTION DE L'INCULPEE DANS LES CONDITIONS PREVUES PAR L'ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE PAR UNE DECISION SPECIALEMENT MOTIVEE D'APRES LES ELEMENTS DE L'ESPECE AINSI QUE L'EXIGE L'ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE ET POUR DES CAS LIMITATIVEMENT ENUMERES PAR L'ARTICLE 144 DUDIT CODE ;

REJETTE LE POURVOI ;