Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Untimely Filing in Injury Damages Case
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe civil party appealed a Court of Appeal decision regarding damages stemming from involuntary injury proceedings, but the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed on July 22, 1982, which was after the expiration of the time limit prescribed by Article 568, first paragraph, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as the challenged decision was rendered on June 1, 1982, following a hearing on May 18, 1982, where the civil party was duly represented.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 568 ALINEA 1ER, ALINEA 2-1° DU MEME ARTICLE, ARTICLE 424 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Untimely Filing in Injury Damages Case: The civil party appealed a Court of Appeal decision regarding damages stemming from involuntary injury proceedings, but the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed on July 22, 1982, which was after the expiration of the time limit prescribed by Article 568, first paragraph, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as the challenged decision was rendered on June 1, 1982, following a hearing on May 18, 1982, where the civil party was duly represented.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the provision establishing the deadline for filing the appeal, which was exceeded by the applicant.
Cited to establish the applicability of the deadline mentioned in Article 568 alinéa 1er to the present case.
Cited in the reasoning section regarding representation at the appeal hearing, but it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (which only pronounce inadmissibility and costs).
Texte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - FRAVOLLO GERMAINE EPOUSE Y..., PARTIE CIVILE, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE LYON, 4EME CHAMBRE, EN DATE DU 1ER JUIN 1982 QUI, DANS UNE PROCEDURE SUIVIE CONTRE BELLO-RODRIGUEZ JOSE DU X... DE BLESSURES INVOLONTAIRES, S'EST PRONONCE SUR LES REPARATIONS CIVILES ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT ET LE MEMOIRE EN DEFENSE ;
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI ;
ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE MENTIONNE QUE LA CAUSE A ETE APPELEE, INSTRUITE ET DEBATTUE A L'AUDIENCE DE LA COUR D'APPEL DU 18 MAI 1982 OU FRAVOLLO GERMAINE EPOUSE Y..., PARTIE CIVILE, A ETE REPRESENTEE PAR SON AVOCAT, CONFORMEMENT AUX DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 424 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
QUE LEDIT JOUR L'AFFAIRE, MISE EN DELIBERE, A ETE RENVOYEE CONTRADICTOIREMENT AU 1ER JUIN 1982 ;
QUE L'ARRET A ETE EFFECTIVEMENT RENDU CE 1ER JUIN 1982 ;
ATTENDU QUE DAME Y... N'A FORME SON POURVOI EN CASSATION CONTRE LEDIT ARRET QUE LE 22 JUILLET 1982, SOIT APRES L'EXPIRATION DU DELAI PREVU PAR L'ARTICLE 568 ALINEA 1ER DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, APPLICABLE AUX TERMES DE L'ALINEA 2-1° DU MEME ARTICLE ;
QUE DES LORS LE POURVOI DOIT ETRE DECLARE IRRECEVABLE COMME TARDIF ;
DECLARE LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE ;
CONDAMNE LA DEMANDERESSE AUX DEPENS ;