Appeal on Voluntary Homicide Sentence Rejected for Procedural Defects
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal challenged a decision by the Court of Assizes of the North that sentenced the appellant to eighteen years of criminal confinement for voluntary homicide, but the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal because the personal memorandum filed by the appellant only discussed the facts already determined by the court and jury, contained no legal arguments, and cited no relevant legal texts, thus failing to meet the requirements for admissibility under the Code of Criminal Procedure, while affirming that the procedure was regular and the sentence was legally applied to the established facts.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 590 du code de procédure pénale; Appeal on Voluntary Homicide Sentence Rejected for Procedural Defects: The appeal challenged a decision by the Court of Assizes of the North that sentenced the appellant to eighteen years of criminal confinement for voluntary homicide, but the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal because the personal memorandum filed by the appellant only discussed the facts already determined by the court and jury, contained no legal arguments, and cited no relevant legal texts, thus failing to meet the requirements for admissibility under the Code of Criminal Procedure, while affirming that the procedure was regular and the sentence was legally applied to the established facts.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was rejected because the memorandum did not meet the requirements imposed by this article, lacking any legal argument or specific violation cited.
Texte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : X... VICTOR CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'ASSISES DU NORD DU 9 NOVEMBRE 1982 QUI L'A CONDAMNE, POUR HOMICIDE VOLONTAIRE, A 18 ANS DE RECLUSION CRIMINELLE ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT ET SIGNE PAR LE DEMANDEUR ;
ATTENDU QUE LE MEMOIRE, QUI SE BORNE A DISCUTER LES FAITS SUR LESQUELS LA COUR ET LE JURY ONT ETE INTERROGES ET ONT REPONDU DE MANIERE IRREVOCABLE, NE CONTIENT AUCUN MOYEN DE DROIT ET NE VISE AUCUN DES TEXTES DE LOI DONT LA VIOLATION EST INVOQUEE ;
QUE DES LORS IL NE REMPLIT PAS LES CONDITIONS IMPOSEES PAR L'ARTICLE 590 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET NE PEUT ETRE ACCUEILLI ;
ET ATTENDU QUE LA PROCEDURE EST REGULIERE ;
QUE LA PEINE A ETE LEGALEMENT APPLIQUEE AUX FAITS DECLARES CONSTANTS PAR LA COUR ET LE JURY ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI ;