Appeal Dismissed: Driving Offenses and Sentence Upheld
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant sought to overturn a Court of Appeal decision that affirmed a conviction for driving without insurance, driving while manifestly intoxicated, refusal to submit to alcohol testing, rebellion, and insulting an officer, resulting in an eight-month prison sentence, a fine, and a two-year license suspension with immediate enforcement. The high court rejected the appeal because no grounds were presented to support the claim, the challenged ruling was procedurally correct, and the facts established by the lower court justified both the legal classifications and the imposed penalties.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAAppeal Dismissed: Driving Offenses and Sentence Upheld: The high court rejected the appeal because no grounds were presented to support the claim, the challenged ruling was procedurally correct, and the facts established by the lower court justified both the legal classifications and the imposed penalties.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI DE : - X... PIERRE - CONTRE UN ARRET RENDU LE 12 MAI 1982 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS QUI, POUR DEFAUT D'ASSURANCE, DEFAUT DE CARTE GRISE, CONDUITE EN ETAT D'IVRESSE MANIFESTE, REBELLION, REFUS DE SE SOUMETTRE AUX VERIFICATIONS TENDANT A PROUVER L'ETAT ALCOOLIQUE ET OUTRAGE A AGENT, L'A CONDAMNE A 8MOIS D'EMPRISONNEMENT, 2.000 FRANCS D'AMENDE ET 2 ANNEES DE SUSPENSION DE PERMIS DE CONDUIRE AVEC EXECUTION PROVISOIRE ;
ATTENDU QU'AUCUN MOYEN N'EST PRODUIT A L'APPUI DU POURVOI, QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ET QUE LES FAITS SOUVERAINEMENT CONSTATES JUSTIFIENT LA QUALIFICATION ET LA PEINE ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI ;