Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
04-45750 Généré par l'IA

Labor Advisor Provisional Payment Upheld Against Employer Appeal

Numéro de cause 04-45750
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An employee sued their employer in an urgent proceeding seeking a provisional payment for back wages and damages due to interference with their mandate as a labor court advisor. The employer appealed the decision to grant this provisional payment, alleging violations of several procedural and substantive labor laws. The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, reasoning that the appellate court reasonably found that the employer's suppression of the employee's scheduled work during mandated labor court duties and training directly resulted in a reduction of recorded overtime and deprived the employee of guaranteed maintained remuneration, establishing that the employee's claims were not subject to serious dispute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

article L. 514-3 du Code du travail, Article L. 514-1, Article L. 451-2, Article L. 514-3, Article L. 212-5, Article L. 212-8-5; Labor Advisor Provisional Payment Upheld Against Employer Appeal: The employer appealed the decision to grant this provisional payment, alleging violations of several procedural and substantive labor laws. The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, reasoning that the appellate court reasonably found that the employer's suppression of the employee's scheduled work during mandated labor court duties and training directly resulted in a reduction of recorded overtime and deprived the employee of guaranteed maintained remuneration, establishing that the employee's claims were not subject to serious dispute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
provision ad litem rémunération du travail versement de dommages-intérêts heures de travail supplémentaires garanties procédurales maintien du paiement du salaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
article L. 514-3 du Code du travail
451-2 auquel renvoie l'article L. 514-3 du Code du travail ; qu'elle a ainsi, sans encourir les griefs du moyen, fait ressortir que les demandes du salarié ne se heurtaient à aucune contestation sérieuse et a légalement justifié sa décision ; que le moyen n'est pas fondé ;
Article L. 514-1
Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.
Article L. 451-2
Cited in the reasoning underpinning the court of appeal's decision regarding the employee's remuneration which was upheld.
Article L. 514-3
Cited in the reasoning underpinning the court of appeal's decision regarding the employee's remuneration which was upheld.
Article L. 212-5
Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.
Article L. 212-8-5
Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.
Article L. 451-1
Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.
Article D. 514-4
Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
16/027201
Employer Challenge to Provisional Execution of Labor Judgment
11/01541
Employee Wage Claim Appeal Upheld Against Unrepresented Employer
08/00042
Employer Challenge to Provisional Execution of Labor Judgment Denied
04-46272
Employee v. Employer (Provisional Wage Payment)
JURITEXT000006952469
Employer Appeal on Provisional Payment for Language Bonuses

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Article L. 514-1

Cited in the reasoning underpinning the court of appeal's decision regarding the employee's remuneration which was upheld.

Article L. 451-2

Cited in the reasoning underpinning the court of appeal's decision regarding the employee's remuneration which was upheld.

Article L. 514-3

Cited in the reasoning underpinning the court of appeal's decision regarding the employee's remuneration which was upheld.

Article L. 212-5

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article L. 212-8-5

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article L. 514-1

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article L. 451-1

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article D. 514-4

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article D. 514-6

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article D. 514-7

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article R. 950-14

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Article L. 122-8-5

Cited by the appellant in the grounds for appeal which were implicitly rejected by the decision to reject the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant :

Sur le moyen unique :

Attendu que M. X..., salarié de la société Torann-France a attrait son employeur devant la juridiction prud'homale statuant en référé afin d'obtenir le paiement par provision d'une créance salariale et de dommages et intérêts pour entrave à l'exercice de son mandat de conseiller prud'hommes ;

Attendu que, pour des motifs tirés de la violation des articles 455 du nouveau code de procédure civile, R. 516-30 et R. 516-31, alinéa 2, du Code du travail, L. 212-5, L. 212-8-5, L. 514-1 du Code du travail, 1134 du Code civil et de l'article 7.07 de la convention collective des entreprises de nettoyage, L. 451-1 et L. 451-2 du Code du travail, et subsidiairement des articles D. 514-4, D. 514-6, D. 514-7, R. 950-14 et L. 122-8-5 du Code du travail, l'employeur fait grief à l'arrêt attaqué (Paris, 10 juin 2004) de l'avoir condamné au paiement d'une provision sur rappel de salaires et sur dommages-intérêts ;

Mais attendu que la cour d'appel a retenu que la suppression des plannings des prestations de M. X... prévues les trois jours où sa présence était requise au conseil de prud'hommes et pendant les cinq jours de formation a diminué d'autant le nombre des heures supplémentaires comptabilisées en fin d'année et a privé le salarié du maintien de la rémunération prévue par l'alinéa 3 de l'article L. 514-1, et L. 451-2 auquel renvoie l'article L. 514-3 du Code du travail ; qu'elle a ainsi, sans encourir les griefs du moyen, fait ressortir que les demandes du salarié ne se heurtaient à aucune contestation sérieuse et a légalement justifié sa décision ; que le moyen n'est pas fondé ;

PAR CES MOTIFS :

REJETTE le pourvoi ;

Condamne la société Torann-France aux dépens ;

Ainsi fait et jugé par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre sociale, et prononcé par le président en son audience publique du dix janvier deux mille six.