Elector Challenge to Municipal Roll Inadmissibility Upheld Due to Untimely Signed Petition
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA third-party elector appealed a decision that declared their challenge to remove an individual from the municipal electoral roll inadmissible, arguing that although their signed petition arrived late, an unsigned version was submitted on time, and the court ruled outside the timeframe established by the Electoral Code. The reviewing court rejected this appeal, finding that the lower court's decision was legally justified because an unsigned petition is insufficient to validly seize the court, and the late submission of the signed petition rendered the challenge inadmissible, notwithstanding the statutory deadline for the court's ruling, which was not a matter of nullity.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArticle R 14 du code électoral; Elector Challenge to Municipal Roll Inadmissibility Upheld Due to Untimely Signed Petition: The reviewing court rejected this appeal, finding that the lower court's decision was legally justified because an unsigned petition is insufficient to validly seize the court, and the late submission of the signed petition rendered the challenge inadmissible, notwithstanding the statutory deadline for the court's ruling, which was not a matter of nullity.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court validated the lower court's decision, which correctly applied the rule that the time limit fixed by this article is not prescribed under penalty of nullity, supporting the finding of inadmissibility.
Texte complet
ATTENDU QUE BOUMIER, TIERS ELECTEUR, INSCRIT SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE LA COMMUNE DE JUZIERS, FAIT GRIEF AU JUGEMENT ATTAQUE D'AVOIR DECLARE IRRECEVABLE SON RECOURS TENDANT A LA RADIATION DE FATIMA X... DE CETTE LISTE, ALORS QUE SI SA REQUETE SIGNEE ETAIT PARVENUE TARDIVEMENT AU TRIBUNAL, SA REQUETE NON SIGNEE AVAIT ETE RECUE AU GREFFE EN TEMPS UTILE, ET QUE LE TRIBUNAL AVAIT STATUE HORS LE DELAI PREVU A L'ARTICLE R 14 DU CODE ELECTORAL ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE TRIBUNAL QUI A ENONCE QU'UNE REQUETE NON SIGNEE NE POUVAIT LE SAISIR VALABLEMENT ET QUE LA REQUETE SIGNEE RECUE TARDIVEMENT, ETAIT IRRECEVABLE, A, LE DELAI FIXE A L'ARTICLE R 14 DU CODE ELECTORAL N'ETANT PAS PRESCRIT A PEINE DE NULLITE, LEGALEMENT JUSTIFIE SA DECISION ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 8 FEVRIER 1983, PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE MANTES LA JOLIE,