Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missing Contested Decision Copy
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with Article R.15-2, paragraph 2 of the Electoral Code, which mandates that the declaration of appeal must be accompanied by a copy of the contested decision; since the necessary copy was missing when the appeal was submitted to the clerk's office, the court upheld the procedural requirement and dismissed the appeal against the judgment rendered by the lower court on January 25, 1983.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE R.15-2 ALINEA 2 DU CODE ELECTORAL; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missing Contested Decision Copy: The appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with Article R.15-2, paragraph 2 of the Electoral Code, which mandates that the declaration of appeal must be accompanied by a copy of the contested decision; since the necessary copy was missing when the appeal was submitted to the clerk's office, the court upheld the procedural requirement and dismissed the appeal against the judgment rendered by the lower court on January 25, 1983.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis provision dictates the inadmissibility of the appeal if it is not accompanied by a copy of the decision under appeal, which justified the court's final order.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE, SELON L'ARTICLE R.15-2 ALINEA 2 DU CODE ELECTORAL, A PEINE D'IRRECEVABILITE DU POURVOI, PRONONCEE D'OFFICE, LA DECLARATION DOIT ETRE ACCOMPAGNEE D'UNE COPIE DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE ;
ATTENDU QUE, DANS LA CAUSE, LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI N'ETAIT PAS ACCOMPAGNEE, LORSQU'ELLE A ETE FAITE OU REMISE AU SECRETARIAT-GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE D'UNE COPIE DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE ;
QU'AINSI, IL N'A PAS ETE SATISFAIT AUX PRESCRIPTIONS DU TEXTE SUSVISE ;
DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME PAR MARYLINE X... EPOUSE Y..., CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 25 JANVIER 1983, PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE NEUFCHATEAU ;