Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000007079712 Généré par l'IA

Military Domicile and Electoral Roll Inscription Appeal

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000007079712
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal challenged a decision to strike a married couple from an electoral roll, arguing that the husband, a career military member whose last domicile was in the commune, should remain listed under the relevant electoral code provision concerning domicile for military personnel. However, the court upheld the lower court's finding that although the wife was a co-owner of property there, the couple did not pay local direct taxes, failed to prove their principal establishment remained in the commune, and had resided elsewhere for several years, thus correctly concluding they did not meet the conditions for inscription in that commune under the general rules of the electoral code.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE L.11 DU CODE ELECTORAL, ARTICLE L.13 DU CODE ELECTORAL, ARTICLES L.12 ET L.13 DU MEME CODE; Military Domicile and Electoral Roll Inscription Appeal: However, the court upheld the lower court's finding that although the wife was a co-owner of property there, the couple did not pay local direct taxes, failed to prove their principal establishment remained in the commune, and had resided elsewhere for several years, thus correctly concluding they did not meet the conditions for inscription in that commune under the general rules of the electoral code.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
personnel militaire domicile registre des mariages acquêts registre des électeurs latoisage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE L.11 DU CODE ELECTORAL
The court used this article to confirm that the conditions for inscription on the electoral list of the commune of Lure were not met.
ARTICLE L.13 DU CODE ELECTORAL
This article was part of the discussion regarding the potential exception the appellant could have invoked, which the court ultimately rejected based on the facts established under Art. L. 11.
ARTICLES L.12 ET L.13 DU MEME CODE
These articles were cited in conjunction with Art. L.11 to define the scope of the decision regarding maintenance on the electoral list of Lure.
Généré par l'IA
95-60166
Couple's Electoral Roll Registration Appeal
JURITEXT000007077339
Electoral Roll Removal Appeal Based on Tax Roll Inscription
90-60142
Elector Appeal Regarding Spouse's Electoral Roll Removal
91-60095
Electoral Roll Challenge Based on Spousal Property Ownership Upheld
77-60260
Elector Challenge to Spousal Electoral Registration Upheld

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE L.11 DU CODE ELECTORAL

The court used this article to confirm that the conditions for inscription on the electoral list of the commune of Lure were not met.

ARTICLE L.13 DU CODE ELECTORAL

This article was part of the discussion regarding the potential exception the appellant could have invoked, which the court ultimately rejected based on the facts established under Art. L. 11.

ARTICLES L.12 ET L.13 DU MEME CODE

These articles were cited in conjunction with Art. L.11 to define the scope of the decision regarding maintenance on the electoral list of Lure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF AU JUGEMENT ATTAQUE D'AVOIR REJETE LE RECOURS DE FREMIOT, TIERS ELECTEUR INSCRIT SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE LURE, CONTRE LA DECISION DE LA COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNALE QUI A RADIE LES EPOUX X... DE LADITE LISTE ALORS QUE X... MILITAIRE DE CARRIERE DONT LE DERNIER DOMICILE ETAIT A LURE AURAIT PU INVOQUER L'ARTICLE L.13 DU CODE ELECTORAL ;

MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT CONSTATE QUE SI DAME X... EST COPROPRIETAIRE INDIVIS A LURE D'UNE MAISON, ELLE NE FIGURAIT AU ROLE D'AUCUNE CONTRIBUTION DIRECTE DE CETTE COMMUNE, QUE LES EPOUX NE JUSTIFIAIENT PAS AVOIR CONSERVE A LURE LEUR PRINCIPAL ETABLISSEMENT ET RELEVE QU'ILS HABITENT AUBAGNE DEPUIS LE 2 JANVIER 1980 ;

ATTENDU QUE C'EST A BON DROIT QUE LE TRIBUNAL A DEDUIT DE CES CONSTATATIONS ET APPRECIATIONS QUE X... ET SON EPOUSE REMPLISSAIT L'UNE DES CONDITIONS FIXEES A L'ARTICLE L.11 DU CODE ELECTORAL POUR ETRE INSCRITS SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE D'UNE COMMUNE AUTRE QUE CELLES VISEES AUX ARTICLES L.12 ET L.13 DU MEME CODE NE POUVAIENT ETRE MAINTENUS SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE LA COMMUNE DE LURE ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 25 JANVIER 1983 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE LURE ;