Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missing Decision Copy
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with the requirement of Article R15-2, paragraph 2 of the Electoral Code, which mandates that the declaration of appeal must be accompanied by a copy of the decision being challenged, a procedural requirement that, when not met, leads to inadmissibility being declared ex officio, as the required copy was missing when the appeal documents were submitted to the clerk's office of the Tribunal d'instance.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArticle R15-2, alinéa 2 du Code électoral; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missing Decision Copy: The appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with the requirement of Article R15-2, paragraph 2 of the Electoral Code, which mandates that the declaration of appeal must be accompanied by a copy of the decision being challenged, a procedural requirement that, when not met, leads to inadmissibility being declared ex officio, as the required copy was missing when the appeal documents were submitted to the clerk's office of the Tribunal d'instance.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAProvision explicitly cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to non-submission of a copy of the challenged decision.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE, SELON L'ARTICLE R15-2, ALINEA 2 DU CODE ELECTORAL, A PEINE D'IRRECEVABILITE DU POURVOI, PRONONCEE D'OFFICE, LA DECLARATION DOIT ETRE ACCOMPAGNEE D'UNE COPIE DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE ;
ATTENDU QUE, DANS LA CAUSE, LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI N'ETAIT PAS ACCOMPAGNEE, LORSQU'ELLE A ETE REMISE AU SECRETARIAT-GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE, D'UNE COPIE DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE ;
QU'AINSI, IL N'A PAS ETE SATISFAIT AUX PRESCRIPTIONS DU TEXTE SUSVISE ;
DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, IRRECEVABLE, LE POURVOI FORME PAR JEAN-MARIE X..., CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 2 FEVRIER 1983 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE FORCALQUIER ;