Lease Rescission Appeal Dismissed Due to Factual Findings Review
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal contested a lower court decision regarding the rescission of a lease, arguing violations of the Civil Code article on contract termination and a failure to address arguments; however, the reviewing court found that the sole purpose of the appeal was to challenge the factual assessment by the lower court judges regarding the seriousness of the breaches that justified the lease termination, leading the court to dismiss the appeal as the factual findings of the lower court were sovereign.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 1184 DU CODE CIVIL, l'article 1184 du code civil; Lease Rescission Appeal Dismissed Due to Factual Findings Review: The appeal contested a lower court decision regarding the rescission of a lease, arguing violations of the Civil Code article on contract termination and a failure to address arguments; however, the reviewing court found that the sole purpose of the appeal was to challenge the factual assessment by the lower court judges regarding the seriousness of the breaches that justified the lease termination, leading the court to dismiss the appeal as the factual findings of the lower court were sovereign.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe ground alleged for the appeal (violation of this article) was rejected as not well-founded.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE TEL QU'IL FIGURE AU MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF ET CI-DESSUS : ATTENDU QUE, SOUS COUVERT DE GRIEFS NON FONDES DE VIOLATION DE L'ARTICLE 1184 DU CODE CIVIL ET DE DEFAUT DE REPONSE A CONCLUSIONS, LE MOYEN NE TEND QU'A REMETTRE EN DISCUSSION L'APPRECIATION SOUVERAINE PAR LES JUGES DU FOND DE LA GRAVITE DES MANQUEMENTS SUSCEPTIBLES D'ENTRAINER LA RESILIATION DU BAIL ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN DOIT ETRE ECARTE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 31 MARS 1981 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE ROUEN ;