Electoral Roll Removal Appeal Upheld by Notice Recitation
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn appellant challenged a lower court's decision to remove their name from the electoral roll, arguing they were not summoned to the hearing, but the court rejected this appeal because the challenged judgment explicitly stated that notice was duly given to all listed electors, including the appellant, to appear at the specified hearing date, and such a statement is considered factual evidence until formally challenged and proven false.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAElectoral Roll Removal Appeal Upheld by Notice Recitation: An appellant challenged a lower court's decision to remove their name from the electoral roll, arguing they were not summoned to the hearing, but the court rejected this appeal because the challenged judgment explicitly stated that notice was duly given to all listed electors, including the appellant, to appear at the specified hearing date, and such a statement is considered factual evidence until formally challenged and proven false.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
ATTENDU QUE LUTIN ALEXANDRE FAIT GRIEF AU JUGEMENT ATTAQUE D'AVOIR ORDONNE SA RADIATION DE LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE BASTIA SANS CONVOCATION A L'AUDIENCE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT ENONCE QU'AVERTISSEMENT A ETE DONNE, LE 31 JANVIER 1983, AUX ELECTEURS ET ELECTRICES DONT LES NOMS ET ADRESSES FIGURENT AU RECOURS, D'AVOIR A COMPARAITRE A L'AUDIENCE DU 7 FEVRIER 1983 ;
QUE CETTE MENTION FAIT FOI JUSQU'A INSCRIPTION DE FAUX ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN NE PEUT ETRE ACCUEILLI ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 16 FEVRIER 1983 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE BASTIA ;