Expropriation Compensation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Grounds of Cassation
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA party sought to appeal to the highest court against a decision from the Court of Appeal that determined expropriation compensation, but the declaration of appeal, filed on April 5, 1982, failed to specify any grounds for annulment, and the subsequent supplementary brief, which was required to be filed within three months under the relevant procedural article, did not reach the court registry until August 3, 1982, well past the deadline, leading the court to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the procedural failure to adhere to the stipulated time limits for presenting grounds of cassation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 989 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Expropriation Compensation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Grounds of Cassation: A party sought to appeal to the highest court against a decision from the Court of Appeal that determined expropriation compensation, but the declaration of appeal, filed on April 5, 1982, failed to specify any grounds for annulment, and the subsequent supplementary brief, which was required to be filed within three months under the relevant procedural article, did not reach the court registry until August 3, 1982, well past the deadline, leading the court to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the procedural failure to adhere to the stipulated time limits for presenting grounds of cassation.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article defines the procedural requirements for filing an appeal, the non-compliance with which led to the declaration of inadmissibility.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI CONTESTEE PAR LA DEFENSE : VU L'ARTICLE 989 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ATTENDU QUE PAR DECLARATION RECUE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AMIENS LE 5 AVRIL 1982, ME DE X..., AVOUE A LA COUR D'APPEL A DECLARE SE POURVOIR EN CASSATION CONTRE L'ARRET DU 11 DECEMBRE 1981 QUI A FIXE L'INDEMNITE D'EXPROPRIATION DUE A M Y... PIERRE ;
QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI NE FORMULE AUCUN MOYEN DE CASSATION ;
QUE LE MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF PRODUIT AU NOM DE M Y... N'EST PARVENU AU GREFFE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION QUE LE 3 AOUT 1982 ALORS QUE LE DELAI DE TROIS MOIS PREVU PAR LE TEXTE SUSVISE ETAIT EXPIRE, D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 11 DECEMBRE 1981 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'ANGERS ;