Mayor's Inadmissible Appeal of Electoral Roll Decision
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal filed by the mayor of a commune against a decision by the local court ordering the registration of a couple on the electoral roll was deemed inadmissible because the relevant electoral code specifies exhaustively the parties entitled to file an appeal with the Court of Cassation following a decision on electoral roll challenges, and this enumeration does not include the mayor acting in that capacity, unless the mayor was a party to the lower court proceedings as a registered elector.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE L 25 DU CODE ELECTORAL, ARTICLE L 27; Mayor's Inadmissible Appeal of Electoral Roll Decision: The appeal filed by the mayor of a commune against a decision by the local court ordering the registration of a couple on the electoral roll was deemed inadmissible because the relevant electoral code specifies exhaustively the parties entitled to file an appeal with the Court of Cassation following a decision on electoral roll challenges, and this enumeration does not include the mayor acting in that capacity, unless the mayor was a party to the lower court proceedings as a registered elector.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article limits who can contest a decision regarding voter registration, excluding the mayor acting in his official capacity from the list of those authorized to appeal to the Court of Cassation.
This article governs who can appeal to the Court of Cassation in electoral registration matters, which is limited based on the restrictions set out in Article L 25.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE LE POURVOI EST FORME PAR LE MAIRE DE LA COMMUNE DE BULAT PESTIVIEN, CONTRE LE JUGEMENT DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE GUINGAMP, EN DATE DU 3 FEVRIER 1983, QUI A ORDONNE L'INSCRIPTION DES EPOUX X... SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE CETTECOMMUNE MAIS ATTENDU QUE L'ARTICLE L 25 DU CODE ELECTORAL, QUI ENUMERE LIMITATIVEMENT LES PERSONNES QUI PEUVENT FORMER UNE CONTESTATION RELATIVEMENT A L'INSCRIPTION OU A LA RADIATION D'UN ELECTEUR, ET, ENSUITE, ETRE, EVENTUELLEMENT, ADMISES A SE POURVOIR EN CASSATION EN VERTU DE L'ARTICLE L 27, NE COMPREND, PAS DANS ENUMERATION LE MAIRE PRIS EN CETTE QUALITE, LA VOIE DU POURVOI EN CASSATION LUI ETANT SEULEMENT OUVERTE LORSQU'IL A ETE PARTIE A L'INSTANCE DEVANT LE TRIBUNAL EN QUALITE D'ELECTEUR INSCRIT SUR LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE LA COMMUNE ;
DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 3 FEVRIER 1983 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE GUINGAMP ;