Appeal Dismissed for Re-litigation of Established Facts
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal contested a lower court's decision by alleging a lack of legal basis and violation of the relevant Civil Code article concerning prescription, but the grounds raised merely sought to re-litigate the facts of possession, which had already been definitively established by the trial court; therefore, the sole argument presented was dismissed as unfounded, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 2229 DU CODE CIVIL, REJETTE LE POURVOI; Appeal Dismissed for Re-litigation of Established Facts: The appeal contested a lower court's decision by alleging a lack of legal basis and violation of the relevant Civil Code article concerning prescription, but the grounds raised merely sought to re-litigate the facts of possession, which had already been definitively established by the trial court; therefore, the sole argument presented was dismissed as unfounded, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe ground for appeal (lack of legal basis and violation of this article regarding prescription) was rejected because it merely sought to re-discuss facts already settled by the lower court.
The court explicitly rejects the appeal.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, TEL QU'IL FIGURE AU MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF ET CI-DESSUS : ATTENDU QUE NE TENDANT, SOUS COUVERT DE GRIEFS NON FONDES DE MANQUE DE BASE LEGALE ET DE VIOLATION DE L'ARTICLE 2229 DU CODE CIVIL, QU'A INSTAURER UNE NOUVELLE DISCUSSION DES FAITS DE POSSESSION INVOQUES A L'APPUI DE LA PRESCRIPTION ET SOUVERAINEMENT CARACTERISES PAR LES JUGES DU FOND, LE MOYEN NE PEUT QU'ETRE ECARTE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 13 OCTOBRE 1981, PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE MONTPELLIER ;