Divorce Denial Upheld on Insufficient Evidence of Marital Fault
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant sought a divorce, but the lower court decision was upheld, which denied the divorce because neither the investigation nor the submitted testimonies established the wife's responsibility for the marital discord, leading the Court of Cassation to affirm that the Court of Appeal had legitimately exercised its sovereign power to assess the evidence and the gravity of the alleged facts, thereby legally justifying its decision to reject the appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAL 131-6 DU CODE DE L'ORGANISATION JUDICIAIRE; Divorce Denial Upheld on Insufficient Evidence of Marital Fault: The appellant sought a divorce, but the lower court decision was upheld, which denied the divorce because neither the investigation nor the submitted testimonies established the wife's responsibility for the marital discord, leading the Court of Cassation to affirm that the Court of Appeal had legitimately exercised its sovereign power to assess the evidence and the gravity of the alleged facts, thereby legally justifying its decision to reject the appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis provision is mentioned as the legal basis considered by the court, although the actual basis for rejecting the appeal (Rejet) is related to the court's sovereign power to assess evidence, which implicitly validates the previous decision under the framework of judicial organization.
Texte complet
VU L'ARTICLE L 131-6 DU CODE DE L'ORGANISATION JUDICIAIRE ;
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, PRIS EN SES QUATRE BRANCHES : ATTENDU QUE POUR DEBOUTER PETIT DE SA DEMANDE EN DIVORCE, L'ARRET CONFIRMATIF ATTAQUE RETIENT QUE NI L'ENQUETE, NI LES ATTESTATIONS PRODUITES NE PERMETTENT D'ATTRIBUER A LA FEMME LA RESPONSABILITE DE LA MESENTENTE CONJUGALE ;
QUE, PAR CES ENONCIATIONS, LA COUR D'APPEL, QUI N'A FAIT QU'USER DE SON POUVOIR SOUVERAIN D'APPRECIER TANT LA VALEUR ET LA PORTEE DES ELEMENTS DE PREUVE QUI LUI ETAIENT SOUMIS QUE LA GRAVITE DES FAITS ALLEGUES, A LEGALEMENT JUSTIFIE SA DECISION ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 9 JUILLET 1981 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE ;