Appeal Concerning Seniority Premiums Voided by Prior Quashing of Judgment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellate court's decision, which ruled on the liquidation of seniority premiums following a prior judgment ordering that liquidation, was necessarily overturned because the Supreme Court had previously quashed the preceding judgment on March 5, 1981; the Court ruled that, pursuant to the relevant article of the Code of Civil Procedure, no further ruling was necessary on the appeal concerning the later decision, as the quashing of the prior judgment automatically voided the subsequent one.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 625 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Appeal Concerning Seniority Premiums Voided by Prior Quashing of Judgment: The appellate court's decision, which ruled on the liquidation of seniority premiums following a prior judgment ordering that liquidation, was necessarily overturned because the Supreme Court had previously quashed the preceding judgment on March 5, 1981; the Court ruled that, pursuant to the relevant article of the Code of Civil Procedure, no further ruling was necessary on the appeal concerning the later decision, as the quashing of the prior judgment automatically voided the subsequent one.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited in relation to the preceding annulment decision that necessitates setting aside the current challenged decision.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU L'ARTICLE 625 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE A STATUE EN SUITE D'UN ARRET DE LA MEME COUR DU 21 FEVRIER 1979 QUI AVAIT RENVOYE LES PARTIES A LIQUIDER SUR ETAT LES PRIMES D'ANCIENNETE DUES A GUNTHER X... ;
QUE CE DERNIER ARRET A ETE ANNULE PAR ARRET DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DU 5 MARS 1981, QUE CETTE CASSATION ENTRAINE NECESSAIREMENT SANS QU'IL SOIT BESOIN DE STATUER A NOUVEAU DE CE CHEF, LA CASSATION DE L'ARRET PRESENTEMENT ATTAQUE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DIT N'Y AVOIR LIEU A STATUER SUR LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE DU 30 JANVIER 1980 ;