Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
80-92313 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Civil Damages in Criminal Conviction

Numéro de cause 80-92313
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In an appeal concerning only the civilly liable party against a final criminal conviction, the Court of Appeal correctly rejected a request for damages based on a civil procedure article, as the rules of criminal procedure are matters of law, and the cited provision, being regulatory in nature, cannot be applied in criminal jurisdiction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 700 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ARTICLE 10, 591 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 749 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Appeal Regarding Civil Damages in Criminal Conviction: In an appeal concerning only the civilly liable party against a final criminal conviction, the Court of Appeal correctly rejected a request for damages based on a civil procedure article, as the rules of criminal procedure are matters of law, and the cited provision, being regulatory in nature, cannot be applied in criminal jurisdiction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motifs de cassation article du CPC action civile séquestre procédure pénale sanction pénale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 700 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
The court rejected the claim for damages based on this article because its regulatory nature prevents its application in criminal jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 10, 591 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
These articles were cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.
ARTICLE 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This article was cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.
ARTICLE 749 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
This article was cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.
Généré par l'IA
95-81063
Appeal Regarding Civil Damages Following Criminal Conviction for Violence
01/00103-I
Appeal on Civil Damages Following Criminal Violence Conviction
17-87428
Criminal Conviction Civil Damages Appeal Regarding Commercial Practices
99-87989
Appeal Regarding Conviction for Malicious Denunciation and Abuse of Civil Action
89-84040
Civil Party Appeal on Damage Indemnification in Injury Case Rejected

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 700 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

The court rejected the claim for damages based on this article because its regulatory nature prevents its application in criminal jurisdiction.

ARTICLE 10, 591 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

These articles were cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.

ARTICLE 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This article was cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.

ARTICLE 749 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

This article was cited in the grounds for cassation presented by the appellant, which the court ultimately rejected.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT PAR LE DEMANDEUR ET SIGNE PAR LUI ;

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE DE CASSATION, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 10, 591 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET DES ARTICLES 700 ET 749 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE", ENSEMBLE L'ARTICLE 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;

ATTENDU QUE LA COUR D'APPEL, SAISIE PAR LA PARTIE CIVILE D'UNE DEMANDE DE DOMMAGES-INTERETS FONDEE SUR L'ARTICLE 700 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE ET STATUANT SUR LE SEUL APPEL DU CIVILEMENT RESPONSABLE INTERJETE CONTRE UN JUGEMENT DEVENU DEFINITIF SUR LA CONDAMNATION PENALE, A REJETE A BON DROIT LADITE DEMANDE ;

ATTENDU EN EFFET QUE LES REGLES DE LA PROCEDURE PENALE ETANT, AUX TERMES MEMES DE L'ARTICLE 34 DE LA CONSTITUTION, DU DOMAINE DE LA LOI, LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 700 PRECITE QUI SONT DE NATURE REGLEMENTAIRE NE SAURAIENT TROUVER LEUR APPLICATION DEVANT LA JURIDICTION PENALE ;

ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;

REJETTE LE POURVOI ;

CONDAMNE LA DEMANDERESSE A L'AMENDE ET AUX DEPENS.