Public Prosecutor v. Deputy Public Prosecutor (Disclosure of Amnestied Conviction)
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe First Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation reviewed a request from the Public Prosecutor at the Court of First Instance of Aix-en-Provence seeking the designation of an investigating Chamber of Accusation concerning a civil complaint filed against a Deputy Public Prosecutor for allegedly disclosing a foreign conviction against the complainant which was supposedly erased by amnesty during a criminal proceeding. The Court determined that the alleged act, even if proven, did not constitute an offense under Article 127 of the Penal Code, as cited by the complainant, meaning the Deputy Public Prosecutor was not subject to indictment for an offense committed while exercising his functions under Article 681 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and therefore ruled that there was no need to designate a jurisdiction.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 681 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Public Prosecutor v. Deputy Public Prosecutor (Disclosure of Amnestied Conviction): The Court determined that the alleged act, even if proven, did not constitute an offense under Article 127 of the Penal Code, as cited by the complainant, meaning the Deputy Public Prosecutor was not subject to indictment for an offense committed while exercising his functions under Article 681 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and therefore ruled that there was no need to designate a jurisdiction.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court implicitly relies on this article, which governs jurisdiction designation in cases involving public officials, to conclude that no offense was committed justifying the designation.
Texte complet
LA COUR, STATUANT SUR LA REQUETE DU PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE PRES LE TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, TENDANT A LA DESIGNATION DE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION QUI POURRA ETRE CHARGEE D'INSTRUIRE SUR LA PLAINTE AVEC CONSTITUTION DE PARTIE CIVILE DE LUDGER X... CONTRE M. YVES Y...;
VU LADITE REQUETE ; VU LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 681 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
ATTENDU QUE, SELON LE PLAIGNANT, LE SUBSTITUT DU PROCUREUR GENERAL YVES Y... AVAIT FAIT ETAT, AU COURS DES DEBATS D'UNE PROCEDURE CRIMINELLE, D'UNE CONDAMNATION PRONONCEE PAR UNE JURIDICTION ETRANGERE CONTRE X..., ET QUI AURAIT ETE EFFACEE PAR L'AMNISTIE ;
ATTENDU QU'UN TEL FAIT, MEME S'IL EST ETABLI, NE CONSTITUE PAS UNE INFRACTION A L'ARTICLE 127 DU CODE PENAL, VISE PAR LE PLAIGNANT ; D'OU IL SUIT QUE M. YVES Y..., SUBSTITUT DU PROCUREUR GENERAL, N'EST PAS SUSCEPTIBLE D'ETRE INCULPE, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 681 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, D'UNE INFRACTION COMMISE DANS L'EXERCICE DE SES FONCTIONS ;
PAR CES MOTIFS :
DIT N'Y AVOIR LIEU A DESIGNATION DE JURIDICTION.